Forget Persuasion. B2B Messaging Has a New Metric.
- Vivien

- Oct 29
- 3 min read
Updated: 2 days ago

For years, we’ve been told B2B messaging is all about persuasion:
Make them choose us.
Convince them we’re better.
Here’s what makes us unique.
Get them to agree.
Show them why they should switch.
But what if that approach does more harm than good?
Persuasion often backfires because it assumes people are ready to decide when most of them aren’t even sure what they’re deciding on.
Especially in B2B, where decisions move through 7 people, 5 meetings, and 3 rounds of budget reviews.
Because when your message tries too hard to persuade, to convince, it adds to their cognitive load.
It feels like pressure.
And pressure creates resistance.
You’ve felt it.
That moment when someone pitches an idea and your first instinct isn’t curiosity, it’s defense.“Why are they pushing this so hard?”
That’s not bad messaging.
It’s just the wrong approach for B2B.
So here’s something that's building traction.
The B2B Brain at Work
Most B2B decisions don’t happen in one sitting or with one person.
They happen in fragments — shared links, short summaries, forwarded slides, whispered “what do you think?” moments.
That’s why persuasion falls flat.
You can’t persuade someone who’s only seeing 10% of your message.
You can, however, progress them.
Progression: The Real Job of B2B Messaging
Progression is different from persuasion.
Persuasion wants a yes.
Progression wants movement.
Instead of asking, “How can I convince them?”
Ask,“How can I move them one step closer to curiosity, clarity, or consensus?”
What that looks like:
Turning a cold reader into a curious one.
Helping a manager see themselves in the problem.
Giving a decision maker language to explain your idea internally.
Small progressions compound movement
That’s how change happens in complex organisations. Not through a single powerful argument, but through a steady chain of small, believable steps that get each member of the Buying Committee agreeing.
There's a better way:
That’s what the old IBM ads understood.
They didn’t push for a “yes.”
IBM didn’t shout, “Buy our computers."
They built the next step.
They showed what was changing in the world of business, invited leaders in and made them want to keep up.
Example: Persuasion vs. Progressing
Persuasive (Convincing):

What happens: Maria skims it, feels a little pushed, and flags it for “later” (aka, never). It’s too much, too soon.
Progressive:

What happens: Maria feels understood, not sold to. You’ve lowered the mental barrier. You’re not asking for a “yes” — you’re inviting a small next step: curiosity.
The Shift
When you stop writing to convince and start writing to progress, everything changes:
Your tone softens.
Your structure simplifies.
You start writing with empathy, not pressure.
You stop trying to close the deal — and start opening the door to conversation.
Let's try a few more:
Persuasive :

Progressive: Don't shout for attention; create a moment of recognition that gets them to want to know more.

The Persuasive:

Progressive:
Replace performance claims with possible outcomes and give the audience a psychological, empathetic way in.

Persuasive Copy:

Progressive Copy:

The Thread That Ties Them All Together
Progression respects attention.
You’re no longer trying to convince someone they need you — you’re helping them feel seen in their current mess.
It meets people where they are — not where you wish they were.
So next time you write a message, ask yourself:
Am I trying to win the argument or helping them make progress?
If your messaging is getting stuck, I can help you build one that creates movement.
🎯 Hi, I'm Vivien,
I work with Heads of Communications, CMOs, and B2B internal and external comms teams who desperately need messaging that:
Sticks
Travels accurately
Gets repeated and remembered
Ticks internal alignment
Creates momentum in buying committees
And moves decisions forward




